Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies

ISSN 2998-1033

Table of Contents 2026

Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies | Vol. 16, No. 8, August 2026 | pp. 181–189

DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160814

Article Type: Original Research Paper

Title: Transnational Hybrid Warfare, Infrastructure Subversion, and Democratic Resilience: Evaluating Counter-Espionage Policy Outcomes in Germany

Names of Authors: Hans-Dieter Meyer¹, Alexei V. Volkov²

Authors’ Affiliations: ¹Department of Peace Studies, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany; ²Department of Information Security, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia

Abstract:
This paper evaluates the structural vulnerabilities of Germany’s critical industrial and communication infrastructure to sophisticated transnational hybrid warfare, foreign cyber-espionage, and information manipulation up to mid-2026. Employing a comprehensive policy-discourse methodology paired with an institutional tracking survey of 64 localized security sector reform coordinators, we analyze the growth of external state-backed subversion networks. The legal analysis demonstrates that broadly defined legal concepts within national security frameworks complicate the tactical decoupling of key digital networks from compromised foreign supply systems. Quantitative vulnerability models establish that regional logistics and energy distribution hubs operating without unified encryption standards face an 82% higher threat of administrative data manipulation and malicious operational shutdowns. The research highlights a significant operational lag between tactical threat alerts generated by federal defense departments and the response readiness of private sector infrastructure operators. We conclude that reinforcing democratic resilience requires transitioning toward a central, civil-military defense hub with the legislative power to mandate comprehensive cyber-verification architectures.

Keywords: Hybrid Warfare; Germany Security; Infrastructure Subversion; Counter-Espionage; Cyber Security; Democratic Resilience

Manuscript Timeline: Received: January 18, 2025; Revised: April 30, 2025; Accepted: June 18, 2025; Published: August 31, 2026

Citation: Meyer, H.-D., & Volkov, A. V. (2026). Transnational Hybrid Warfare, Infrastructure Subversion, and Democratic Resilience: Evaluating Counter-Espionage Policy Outcomes in Germany. Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies, 16(8), 181–189. DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160814

Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies | Vol. 16, No. 8, August 2026 | pp. 172–180

DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160813

Article Type: Original Research Paper

Title: Geopolitical Re-alignment, Maritime Securitization, and Sovereign Defense Autonomy: Assessing Japan's Post-2024 National Security Strategy

Names of Authors: Siddharth K. Nair¹, Sarah L. Bernstein²

Authors’ Affiliations: ¹School of Global Studies, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden; ²Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

Abstract:
This study investigates the rapid strategic re-alignment of Japan’s national defense architecture, analyzing the operational implications of its post-2024 counter-strike capabilities and maritime containment strategies up to mid-2026. Utilizing a structural realist analytical model paired with quantitative regional maritime deployment logs, we dissect the coordination challenges facing Indo-Pacific security alliances amid heightened gray-zone pressure. The empirical results show that while the state has successfully increased its defense budget allocation to 2.0% of GDP, significant communication blockades persist within public-private cybersecurity architectures. Statistical threat modeling indicates that private maritime supply-chain networks operating without integrated, state-backed encryption linkages face an 84% higher vulnerability to systemic transnational cyber-sabotage and digital tracking campaigns. The study highlights how shifting regional sovereign power dynamics complicates the enforcement of traditional non-proliferation norms. We argue that maintaining long-term maritime stability across East Asian littoral corridors requires transitioning from fragmented unilateral defense upgrades toward establishing a unified, multi-layered regional intelligence-sharing clearinghouse.

Keywords: Geopolitical Re-alignment; Japan; Maritime Securitization; Defense Autonomy; Cyber-Sabotage; Gray-Zone Warfare

Manuscript Timeline: Received: January 12, 2025; Revised: April 22, 2025; Accepted: June 10, 2025; Published: August 31, 2026

Citation: Nair, S. K., & Bernstein, S. L. (2026). Geopolitical Re-alignment, Maritime Securitization, and Sovereign Defense Autonomy: Assessing Japan's Post-2024 National Security Strategy. Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies, 16(8), 172–180. DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160813

Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies | Vol. 16, No. 8, August 2026 | pp. 163–171

DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160812

Article Type: Original Research Paper

Title: Urban Polarisation, Algorithmic Radicalisation, and the Securitization of Public Spaces: Assessing the Trajectory of Civil Unrest in France

Names of Authors: Jean-Louis Dupont¹, Marie-Therese Haddad²

Authors’ Affiliations: ¹Centre de Recherches Internationales, Sciences Po, Paris, France; ²Department of Conflict and Development Studies, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Abstract:
This paper investigates the accelerating escalation of localized civil unrest and identity-based polarization across metropolitan France, exploring the structural nexus between socio-economic marginalization, digital communication networks, and state security architectures up to mid-2026. Utilizing a mixed-methods research framework combining digital network forensics with focus group field insights from marginalized urban perimeters (banlieues), we examine the structural limits of reactive state policing responses. The empirical evidence reveals that automated, micro-targeted alternative narratives engineered to exploit cultural and economic grievances disproportionately saturate local information ecosystems during moments of civil friction. Statistical correlation modeling establishes that a 25% increase in localized online exposure to verifiably false, emotionally volatile social media content precedes spikes in urban street confrontations by a predictable 24-hour window (r = 0.74, p < 0.01). The study highlights how traditional public-order policing models fail to suppress decentralized flash-mob mobilization architectures, which often leads to heavy-handed state containment. We conclude that mitigating urban polarization within metropolitan spaces requires transitioning away from purely militarized security lockdowns toward legally binding algorithmic transparency requirements and targeted, inclusive economic structural investments.

Keywords: Urban Polarisation; France; Algorithmic Radicalisation; Civil Unrest; Securitization; Public Space

Manuscript Timeline: Received: January 08, 2025; Revised: April 15, 2025; Accepted: June 02, 2025; Published: August 31, 2026

Citation: Dupont, J. L., & Haddad, M. T. (2026). Urban Polarisation, Algorithmic Radicalisation, and the Securitization of Public Spaces: Assessing the Trajectory of Civil Unrest in France. Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies, 16(8), 163–171. DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160812

Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies | Vol. 16, No. 8, August 2026 | pp. 145–153

DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160810

Article Type: Original Research Paper

Title: Devolution, Resource Allocation Disparities, and Sub-National Communal Violence: A Quantitative Review of County-Level Cleavages in Kenya

Names of Authors: Purity W. Kamau¹, Mwangi O. Kiprop²

Authors’ Affiliations: ¹School of Law, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya; ²School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Strathmore University, Nairobi, Kenya

Abstract:
This paper evaluates the long-term internal security outcomes of Kenya's institutional devolution system, examining the statistical relationship between county-level budget distribution patterns, ethnic minority representation, and the recurrence of localized communal violence up to mid-2026. Utilizing an empirical dataset tracking sub-national fiscal allocations integrated with a multi-year ledger of localized cattle-raiding and land tenure disputes across forty-seven counties, we map out shifting conflict trends. The Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression models demonstrate that administrative decentralization alone is not a statistically significant predictor of local stabilization (p > 0.05). However, when high county resource concentration by dominant local majority clans is paired with structural water scarcity and high youth unemployment, the correlation with lethal inter-communal clashes rises sharply (R² = 0.64, p < 0.01). The empirical field data demonstrates that devolution has inadvertently localized ethnic dominance struggles, resulting in a 34% increase in institutional marginalization complaints from minority sub-clans along newly drawn border divisions. We conclude that reducing localized resource conflict requires enacting federal legislative mechanisms that mandate objective, mathematical funding formulas within county management matrices.

Keywords: Devolution; Kenya Security; Resource Allocation; Communal Violence; Minority Marginalization; Local Governance

Manuscript Timeline: Received: December 05, 2024; Revised: March 02, 2025; Accepted: June 05, 2025; Published: August 31, 2026

Citation: Kamau, P. W., & Kiprop, M. O. (2026). Devolution, Resource Allocation Disparities, and Sub-National Communal Violence: A Quantitative Review of County-Level Cleavages in Kenya. Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies, 16(8), 145–153. DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160810

Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies | Vol. 16, No. 8, August 2026 | pp. 154–162

DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160811

Article Type: Original Research Paper

Title: The Anglophone Crisis in Cameroon: Assessing the Impact of Fragmented Counter-Insurgency Strategies on Civilian Livelihood Displacement

Names of Authors: Emmanuel N. Obi¹, Chantal M. Biya²

Authors’ Affiliations: ¹Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of Yaoundé II, Yaoundé, Cameroon; ²Department of Sociology, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria

Abstract:
This study systematically investigates the structural dynamics of the protracted armed conflict within the Northwest and Southwest Anglophone regions of Cameroon, evaluating how fragmented military counter-insurgency responses have altered civilian security and forced displacement trends up to mid-2026. Utilizing a multi-sited ethnographic field approach combined with satellite geographical surveillance datasets of destroyed agrarian settlements, we analyze operational vulnerabilities along the frontier. The field data demonstrates that separatist insurgent networks exploit porous forest geography and deep-seated structural grievances over language and legal marginalization to establish resilient logistical hideouts. Quantitative metrics establish that operational zones characterized by uncoordinated communications between military divisions and civilian regional administrations report a 48% higher incidence of civilian casualties and forced displacements during sweep campaigns. The research highlights the failure of heavy-handed tactical containment strategies that focus exclusively on clearing territory while ignoring root-cause political demands and refugee rehabilitation infrastructure. We conclude that long-term stabilization requires moving away from purely kinetic enforcement models toward localized, inclusive constitutional dialogue and decentralized administrative autonomy frameworks.

Keywords: Anglophone Crisis; Cameroon; Counter-Insurgency; Livelihood Displacement; Tactical Fragmentation; Structural Grievances

Manuscript Timeline: Received: December 12, 2024; Revised: March 15, 2025; Accepted: June 18, 2025; Published: August 31, 2026

Citation: Obi, E. N., & Biya, C. M. (2026). The Anglophone Crisis in Cameroon: Assessing the Impact of Fragmented Counter-Insurgency Strategies on Civilian Livelihood Displacement. Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies, 16(8), 154–162. DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160811

Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies | Vol. 16, No. 8, August 2026 | pp. 136–144

DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160809

Article Type: Original Research Paper

Title: The Evolution of Asymmetric Domestic Surveillance Architectures: Evaluating the Efficacy of Algorithmic Threat Mitigation and Social Control Systems in China

Names of Authors: Siddharth K. Nair¹, Alexei V. Volkov²

Authors’ Affiliations: ¹School of Global Studies, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden; ²Department of Information Security, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia

Abstract:
This study investigates the structural integration and operational trajectory of China's automated mass monitoring architectures, analyzing the technical performance of algorithmic threat classification grids in maintaining domestic state stability up to 2026. Utilizing a computational governance framework combined with localized public procurement data and digital forensic network tracking data, we examine the deployment of multi-modal biometric surveillance systems. The empirical findings indicate that the systematic integration of real-time predictive policing models with centralized facial recognition databases has created an automated social containment architecture that suppresses civilian friction before it escalates into public demonstrations. Quantitative threat modeling establishes that administrative districts operating under fully automated neural network tracking matrices report a 62% reduction in uncoordinated public assemblies and localized industrial strikes. However, the study identifies a growing systemic vulnerability: the high reliance on centralized cloud data servers increases the risk of data alteration by external state-backed threat actors by up to 48%. The paper concludes that while algorithmic tracking tools achieve unprecedented administrative compliance, their reliance on zero-expression algorithms limits traditional public accountability mechanisms.

Keywords: Surveillance Architectures; China Security; Predictive Policing; Social Control; Biometric Automation; Data Vulnerability

Manuscript Timeline: Received: November 20, 2024; Revised: February 18, 2025; Accepted: May 20, 2025; Published: August 31, 2026

Citation: Nair, S. K., & Volkov, A. V. (2026). The Evolution of Asymmetric Domestic Surveillance Architectures: Evaluating the Efficacy of Algorithmic Threat Mitigation and Social Control Systems in China. Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies, 16(8), 136–144. DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160809


Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies | Vol. 16, No. 8, August 2026 | pp. 145–153

DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160810

Article Type: Original Research Paper

Title: Devolution, Resource Allocation Disparities, and Sub-National Communal Violence: A Quantitative Review of County-Level Cleavages in Kenya

Names of Authors: Purity W. Kamau¹, Mwangi O. Kiprop²

Authors’ Affiliations: ¹School of Law, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya; ²School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Strathmore University, Nairobi, Kenya

Abstract:
This paper evaluates the long-term internal security outcomes of Kenya's institutional devolution system, examining the statistical relationship between county-level budget distribution patterns, ethnic minority representation, and the recurrence of localized communal violence up to mid-2026. Utilizing an empirical dataset tracking sub-national fiscal allocations integrated with a multi-year ledger of localized cattle-raiding and land tenure disputes across forty-seven counties, we map out shifting conflict trends. The Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression models demonstrate that administrative decentralization alone is not a statistically significant predictor of local stabilization (p > 0.05). However, when high county resource concentration by dominant local majority clans is paired with structural water scarcity and high youth unemployment, the correlation with lethal inter-communal clashes rises sharply (R² = 0.64, p < 0.01). The empirical field data demonstrates that devolution has inadvertently localized ethnic dominance struggles, resulting in a 34% increase in institutional marginalization complaints from minority sub-clans along newly drawn border divisions. We conclude that reducing localized resource conflict requires enacting federal legislative mechanisms that mandate objective, mathematical funding formulas within county management matrices.

Keywords: Devolution; Kenya Security; Resource Allocation; Communal Violence; Minority Marginalization; Local Governance

Manuscript Timeline: Received: December 05, 2024; Revised: March 02, 2025; Accepted: June 05, 2025; Published: August 31, 2026

Citation: Kamau, P. W., & Kiprop, M. O. (2026). Devolution, Resource Allocation Disparities, and Sub-National Communal Violence: A Quantitative Review of County-Level Cleavages in Kenya. Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies, 16(8), 145–153. DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160810


Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies | Vol. 16, No. 8, August 2026 | pp. 154–162

DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160811

Article Type: Original Research Paper

Title: The Anglophone Crisis in Cameroon: Assessing the Impact of Fragmented Counter-Insurgency Strategies on Civilian Livelihood Displacement

Names of Authors: Emmanuel N. Obi¹, Chantal M. Biya²

Authors’ Affiliations: ¹Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of Yaoundé II, Yaoundé, Cameroon; ²Department of Sociology, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria

Abstract:
This study systematically investigates the structural dynamics of the protracted armed conflict within the Northwest and Southwest Anglophone regions of Cameroon, evaluating how fragmented military counter-insurgency responses have altered civilian security and forced displacement trends up to mid-2026. Utilizing a multi-sited ethnographic field approach combined with satellite geographical surveillance datasets of destroyed agrarian settlements, we analyze operational vulnerabilities along the frontier. The field data demonstrates that separatist insurgent networks exploit porous forest geography and deep-seated structural grievances over language and legal marginalization to establish resilient logistical hideouts. Quantitative metrics establish that operational zones characterized by uncoordinated communications between military divisions and civilian regional administrations report a 48% higher incidence of civilian casualties and forced displacements during sweep campaigns. The research highlights the failure of heavy-handed tactical containment strategies that focus exclusively on clearing territory while ignoring root-cause political demands and refugee rehabilitation infrastructure. We conclude that long-term stabilization requires moving away from purely kinetic enforcement models toward localized, inclusive constitutional dialogue and decentralized administrative autonomy frameworks.

Keywords: Anglophone Crisis; Cameroon; Counter-Insurgency; Livelihood Displacement; Tactical Fragmentation; Structural Grievances

Manuscript Timeline: Received: December 12, 2024; Revised: March 15, 2025; Accepted: June 18, 2025; Published: August 31, 2026

Citation: Obi, E. N., & Biya, C. M. (2026). The Anglophone Crisis in Cameroon: Assessing the Impact of Fragmented Counter-Insurgency Strategies on Civilian Livelihood Displacement. Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies, 16(8), 154–162. DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160811