Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies

ISSN 2998-1033

Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies | Vol. 16, No. 8, August 2026 | pp. 136–144

DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160809

Article Type: Original Research Paper

Title: The Evolution of Asymmetric Domestic Surveillance Architectures: Evaluating the Efficacy of Algorithmic Threat Mitigation and Social Control Systems in China

Names of Authors: Siddharth K. Nair¹, Alexei V. Volkov²

Authors’ Affiliations: ¹School of Global Studies, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden; ²Department of Information Security, Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn, Estonia

Abstract:
This study investigates the structural integration and operational trajectory of China's automated mass monitoring architectures, analyzing the technical performance of algorithmic threat classification grids in maintaining domestic state stability up to 2026. Utilizing a computational governance framework combined with localized public procurement data and digital forensic network tracking data, we examine the deployment of multi-modal biometric surveillance systems. The empirical findings indicate that the systematic integration of real-time predictive policing models with centralized facial recognition databases has created an automated social containment architecture that suppresses civilian friction before it escalates into public demonstrations. Quantitative threat modeling establishes that administrative districts operating under fully automated neural network tracking matrices report a 62% reduction in uncoordinated public assemblies and localized industrial strikes. However, the study identifies a growing systemic vulnerability: the high reliance on centralized cloud data servers increases the risk of data alteration by external state-backed threat actors by up to 48%. The paper concludes that while algorithmic tracking tools achieve unprecedented administrative compliance, their reliance on zero-expression algorithms limits traditional public accountability mechanisms.

Keywords: Surveillance Architectures; China Security; Predictive Policing; Social Control; Biometric Automation; Data Vulnerability

Manuscript Timeline: Received: November 20, 2024; Revised: February 18, 2025; Accepted: May 20, 2025; Published: August 31, 2026

Citation: Nair, S. K., & Volkov, A. V. (2026). The Evolution of Asymmetric Domestic Surveillance Architectures: Evaluating the Efficacy of Algorithmic Threat Mitigation and Social Control Systems in China. Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies, 16(8), 136–144. DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160809


Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies | Vol. 16, No. 8, August 2026 | pp. 145–153

DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160810

Article Type: Original Research Paper

Title: Devolution, Resource Allocation Disparities, and Sub-National Communal Violence: A Quantitative Review of County-Level Cleavages in Kenya

Names of Authors: Purity W. Kamau¹, Mwangi O. Kiprop²

Authors’ Affiliations: ¹School of Law, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya; ²School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Strathmore University, Nairobi, Kenya

Abstract:
This paper evaluates the long-term internal security outcomes of Kenya's institutional devolution system, examining the statistical relationship between county-level budget distribution patterns, ethnic minority representation, and the recurrence of localized communal violence up to mid-2026. Utilizing an empirical dataset tracking sub-national fiscal allocations integrated with a multi-year ledger of localized cattle-raiding and land tenure disputes across forty-seven counties, we map out shifting conflict trends. The Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression models demonstrate that administrative decentralization alone is not a statistically significant predictor of local stabilization (p > 0.05). However, when high county resource concentration by dominant local majority clans is paired with structural water scarcity and high youth unemployment, the correlation with lethal inter-communal clashes rises sharply (R² = 0.64, p < 0.01). The empirical field data demonstrates that devolution has inadvertently localized ethnic dominance struggles, resulting in a 34% increase in institutional marginalization complaints from minority sub-clans along newly drawn border divisions. We conclude that reducing localized resource conflict requires enacting federal legislative mechanisms that mandate objective, mathematical funding formulas within county management matrices.

Keywords: Devolution; Kenya Security; Resource Allocation; Communal Violence; Minority Marginalization; Local Governance

Manuscript Timeline: Received: December 05, 2024; Revised: March 02, 2025; Accepted: June 05, 2025; Published: August 31, 2026

Citation: Kamau, P. W., & Kiprop, M. O. (2026). Devolution, Resource Allocation Disparities, and Sub-National Communal Violence: A Quantitative Review of County-Level Cleavages in Kenya. Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies, 16(8), 145–153. DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160810


Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies | Vol. 16, No. 8, August 2026 | pp. 154–162

DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160811

Article Type: Original Research Paper

Title: The Anglophone Crisis in Cameroon: Assessing the Impact of Fragmented Counter-Insurgency Strategies on Civilian Livelihood Displacement

Names of Authors: Emmanuel N. Obi¹, Chantal M. Biya²

Authors’ Affiliations: ¹Department of Political Science and International Relations, University of Yaoundé II, Yaoundé, Cameroon; ²Department of Sociology, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria

Abstract:
This study systematically investigates the structural dynamics of the protracted armed conflict within the Northwest and Southwest Anglophone regions of Cameroon, evaluating how fragmented military counter-insurgency responses have altered civilian security and forced displacement trends up to mid-2026. Utilizing a multi-sited ethnographic field approach combined with satellite geographical surveillance datasets of destroyed agrarian settlements, we analyze operational vulnerabilities along the frontier. The field data demonstrates that separatist insurgent networks exploit porous forest geography and deep-seated structural grievances over language and legal marginalization to establish resilient logistical hideouts. Quantitative metrics establish that operational zones characterized by uncoordinated communications between military divisions and civilian regional administrations report a 48% higher incidence of civilian casualties and forced displacements during sweep campaigns. The research highlights the failure of heavy-handed tactical containment strategies that focus exclusively on clearing territory while ignoring root-cause political demands and refugee rehabilitation infrastructure. We conclude that long-term stabilization requires moving away from purely kinetic enforcement models toward localized, inclusive constitutional dialogue and decentralized administrative autonomy frameworks.

Keywords: Anglophone Crisis; Cameroon; Counter-Insurgency; Livelihood Displacement; Tactical Fragmentation; Structural Grievances

Manuscript Timeline: Received: December 12, 2024; Revised: March 15, 2025; Accepted: June 18, 2025; Published: August 31, 2026

Citation: Obi, E. N., & Biya, C. M. (2026). The Anglophone Crisis in Cameroon: Assessing the Impact of Fragmented Counter-Insurgency Strategies on Civilian Livelihood Displacement. Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies, 16(8), 154–162. DOI: 10.46882/2026/GJPCS/160811