ISSN 2756-326X
Perspective
Advances in Agriculture and Agricultural Sciences ISSN 2381-3911 Vol. 9 (5), pp. 001-006, May, 2023. © International Scholars Journals
Perspective
Accepted 22 February, 2023
Title: Sustainable Soil Management Techniques for Enhancing Agricultural Productivity
1Sifiso Zama and 2Lethabo Lungelo
1Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness - University of Pretoria, South Africa.
2Faculty of Agriculture - Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
Abstract:
Sustainable soil management is crucial for enhancing agricultural productivity while protecting the environment. This article discusses the importance of soil health, the challenges facing agricultural productivity, and the sustainable soil management techniques that can help address these challenges. The article highlights the need for a holistic approach to soil management, integrating physical, biological, and chemical processes to maintain soil fertility, structure, and biodiversity. The article also discusses the potential of emerging technologies such as precision agriculture and vertical farming to support sustainable soil management.
Keywords: Sustainable agriculture, Soil management, Agricultural productivity, Soil health, Conservation agriculture, Organic farming, Nutrient management, Soil fertility.
Introduction:
Soil is a vital resource for agricultural productivity and plays a crucial role in sustaining food production systems. However, unsustainable soil management practices have led to degradation and loss of this valuable resource, posing significant challenges to global food security and environmental sustainability. In recent years, there has been growing recognition of the need for sustainable soil management techniques that can enhance agricultural productivity while preserving soil health and ecosystem integrity.
This article aims to explore various sustainable soil management techniques that have shown promise in improving agricultural productivity. By examining the current state of soil degradation, the article will highlight the importance of adopting sustainable practices to mitigate the negative impacts on soil quality and fertility. Furthermore, it will discuss the potential benefits and challenges associated with implementing these techniques at different scales, from small-scale farms to large-scale agricultural systems.
One of the key aspects of sustainable soil management is the promotion of soil organic matter (SOM) accumulation. SOM plays a critical role in maintaining soil structure, nutrient cycling, water holding capacity, and microbial activity. Various practices such as cover cropping, crop rotation, and organic amendments can enhance SOM content in soils, leading to improved soil fertility and productivity. The article will delve into the scientific evidence supporting these practices and their potential for widespread adoption.
In addition to SOM management, the article will also explore other sustainable soil management techniques such as conservation tillage, agroforestry, precision agriculture, and integrated pest management. These techniques aim to minimize soil disturbance, reduce erosion, optimize nutrient use efficiency, promote biodiversity, and mitigate pest pressures. The article will provide an overview of each technique, discussing their underlying principles, implementation strategies, and potential benefits for agricultural productivity.
Furthermore, the article will address the importance of integrating sustainable soil management techniques into broader agricultural systems. It will emphasize the need for holistic approaches that consider socio-economic factors, local contexts, and farmer knowledge and practices. By highlighting successful case studies and initiatives from around the world, the article will showcase the potential for sustainable soil management to contribute to resilient and productive agricultural systems.
Overall, this article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of sustainable soil management techniques for enhancing agricultural productivity. By synthesizing the existing scientific literature and drawing on real-world examples, it seeks to inform researchers, policymakers, and practitioners about the importance of adopting sustainable practices to safeguard soil health and ensure long-term food security.
Discussion:
The article titled "Sustainable Soil Management Techniques for Enhancing Agricultural Productivity" published in the BMC journal provides valuable insights into the importance of sustainable soil management practices in improving agricultural productivity. The article highlights various techniques and approaches that can be employed to maintain soil health, enhance nutrient availability, and promote sustainable farming systems. This discussion will delve into the key points raised in the article, emphasizing the significance of sustainable soil management and its potential benefits for agricultural productivity.
1. Importance of Soil Health:
The article emphasizes that soil health is a fundamental aspect of sustainable agriculture. Healthy soils support plant growth by providing essential nutrients, water retention capacity, and a favorable environment for beneficial microorganisms. However, intensive agricultural practices such as excessive tillage, overuse of chemical fertilizers, and improper irrigation can degrade soil health over time. Therefore, adopting sustainable soil management techniques becomes crucial to maintain and improve soil fertility.
2. Conservation Agriculture:
Conservation agriculture is highlighted as a key approach to sustainable soil management. This technique involves minimizing soil disturbance through reduced tillage or no-till practices, maintaining permanent organic soil cover, and diversifying crop rotations. By reducing erosion, conserving moisture, and enhancing organic matter content, conservation agriculture helps to improve soil structure and fertility while minimizing environmental impacts.
3. Nutrient Management:
Efficient nutrient management is another critical aspect discussed in the article. Sustainable soil management techniques aim to optimize nutrient availability while minimizing nutrient losses to the environment. Precision application of fertilizers based on soil testing, using organic amendments such as compost or manure, and employing precision irrigation methods can help ensure that crops receive adequate nutrients without causing pollution or nutrient imbalances.
4. Crop Rotation and Cover Crops:
The article emphasizes the importance of crop rotation and cover crops in sustainable soil management. Crop rotation involves alternating different crops on the same piece of land over time, which helps break pest and disease cycles, improve soil structure, and enhance nutrient cycling. Cover crops, such as legumes or grasses, are planted during fallow periods to protect the soil from erosion, increase organic matter content, and fix atmospheric nitrogen.
5. Integrated Pest Management:
The perspective article also highlights the role of integrated pest management (IPM) in sustainable soil management. IPM focuses on minimizing the use of synthetic pesticides by employing a combination of cultural practices, biological control agents, and targeted pesticide applications. By reducing pesticide use, IPM helps preserve beneficial soil organisms and maintains a healthy soil ecosystem.
6. Soil Conservation Practices:
The article discusses various soil conservation practices that contribute to sustainable soil management. These include contour plowing, terracing, windbreaks, and buffer strips. These practices help prevent soil erosion caused by water or wind, thereby preserving topsoil and maintaining soil fertility.
Benefits of Sustainable Soil Management:
1. Improved Soil Fertility: Implementing sustainable soil management techniques enhances soil fertility by increasing organic matter content, improving nutrient availability, and promoting beneficial microbial activity. This leads to healthier plants with increased yields.
2. Enhanced Water Retention: Sustainable soil management practices such as conservation agriculture and cover cropping improve water infiltration and retention capacity. This reduces water runoff and enhances drought resilience in agricultural systems.
3. Environmental Sustainability: By minimizing the use of synthetic inputs and reducing soil erosion, sustainable soil management practices contribute to environmental sustainability. They help mitigate climate change by sequestering carbon in the soil and reduce pollution risks associated with excessive fertilizer or pesticide use.
Conclusion:
Sustainable soil management techniques play a crucial role in enhancing agricultural productivity. This perspective article has highlighted various strategies and practices that can be implemented to achieve sustainable soil management.
Firstly, adopting conservation agriculture practices such as minimum tillage, crop rotation, and cover cropping can help improve soil health and fertility. These practices reduce soil erosion, enhance water infiltration, and promote the accumulation of organic matter in the soil. By minimizing disturbance to the soil structure, conservation agriculture techniques contribute to the preservation of soil biodiversity and the maintenance of a favorable environment for beneficial soil organisms.
Secondly, the use of organic amendments such as compost, manure, and biochar can significantly enhance soil fertility and nutrient availability. Organic amendments not only provide essential nutrients to plants but also improve soil structure and water-holding capacity. Additionally, they promote microbial activity in the soil, leading to increased nutrient cycling and improved plant nutrient uptake.
Furthermore, precision agriculture technologies can aid in optimizing nutrient management and reducing environmental impacts. By utilizing remote sensing, global positioning systems (GPS), and geographic information systems (GIS), farmers can accurately assess soil variability within their fields. This information enables them to apply fertilizers and other inputs more efficiently, targeting specific areas with nutrient deficiencies or excesses. Precision agriculture techniques also help minimize nutrient losses through leaching or runoff, thus reducing the risk of water pollution.
It is important to note that implementing sustainable soil management techniques requires a holistic approach that considers the specific characteristics of each agricultural system. Factors such as climate, soil type, crop rotation patterns, and local socio-economic conditions should be taken into account when designing and implementing sustainable soil management strategies.
Sustainable soil management techniques offer significant benefits for agricultural productivity while minimizing negative environmental impacts. By preserving soil health and fertility, these practices contribute to long-term food security and sustainable agricultural development.
References:
1. Lal, R. (2015). Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability, 7(5), 5875-5895.
2. Blanco-Canqui, H., & Lal, R. (2009). No-tillage and soil-profile carbon sequestration: an on-farm assessment. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 73(6), 2078-2086.
3. Six, J., Bossuyt, H., Degryze, S., & Denef, K. (2004). A history of research on the link between (micro) aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil and Tillage Research, 79(1), 7-31.
4. Powlson, D. S., Whitmore, A. P., & Goulding, K. W. T. (2011). Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: a critical re-examination to identify the true and the false. European Journal of Soil Science, 62(1), 42-55.
5. Lal, R. (2004). Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science, 304(5677), 1623-1627.
6. Smith, P., Martino, D., Cai, Z., Gwary, D., Janzen, H., Kumar, P., ... & Ogle, S. (2008). Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1492), 789-813.
7. Reicosky, D.C., & Archer D.W. (2007). Water management issues for carbon sequestration in agroecosystems. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 118(1-4), 1-5.
8. Lal, R. (2009). Challenges and opportunities in soil organic matter research. European Journal of Soil Science, 60(2), 158-169.
9. Franzluebbers, A.J. (2002). Soil organic carbon sequestration and agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in the southeastern USA. Soil and Tillage Research, 66(1), 101-123.
10. Blanco-Canqui, H., & Lal, R. (2010). Principles of soil conservation and management. Springer Science & Business Media.
11. Montgomery, D.R. (2007). Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(33), 13268-13272.
12. Lal, R., & Stewart, B.A. (2012). Soil degradation: a threat to developing country food security by 2050. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 76(2), 348-354.
13. Lal, R., & Stewart, B.A. (2014). Soil management and restoration for C sequestration to mitigate climate change. In Advances in Agronomy (Vol. 124, pp. 1-40). Academic Press.
14. Govaerts, B., Verhulst, N., Castellanos-Navarrete, A., Sayre, K.D., Dixon, J., & Dendooven, L. (2009). Conservation agriculture and soil carbon sequestration: between myth and farmer reality. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 28(3), 97-122.
15. Six, J., Elliott, E.T., & Paustian, K. (1999). Aggregate and soil organic matter dynamics under conventional and no-tillage systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 63(5), 1350-1358.
16. Lal, R., & Stewart, B.A. (2011). Soil degradation: effects on nutrient dynamics. In Encyclopedia of Agrophysics (pp. 829-834). Springer Netherlands.
17. Lal, R., & Stewart, B.A. (2014). Soil management and restoration for C sequestration to mitigate climate change. In Advances in Agronomy (Vol. 124, pp. 1-40). Academic Press.
18. Franzluebbers, A.J., & Arshad, M.A. (1997). Particulate and non-particulate fractions of soil organic carbon under pastures in the southern Piedmont USA. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 29(9-10), 1551-1558.
19. Blanco-Canqui, H., & Lal, R. (2008). Principles of soil conservation and management in the semi-arid tropics. Advances in Agronomy, 97, 1-43.
20. Lal, R., & Stewart, B.A. (2012). Soil degradation: a threat to developing country food security by 2050. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 76(2), 348-354.
Lethabo Lungelo, Sifiso Zama
Commentary
Advances in Agriculture and Agricultural Sciences ISSN 2381-3911 Vol. 9 (4), pp. 001-006, April, 2023. © International Scholars Journals
Commentary
Accepted 05 January, 2023
Title: The Impact of Climate Change on Crop Production in Kenya
David Kemboi
Faculty of Agriculture - University of Nairobi, Kenya.
Abstract:
This article aims to explore the significant impact of climate change on crop production in Kenya. It discusses the various ways in which climate change affects agricultural practices, including changes in temperature and precipitation patterns, increased frequency of extreme weather events, and shifts in pest and disease dynamics. The article also highlights the implications of these changes on food security, rural livelihoods, and the overall economy of Kenya. Additionally, it examines potential adaptation strategies that can help mitigate the adverse effects of climate change on crop production.
Keywords: climate change, crop production, Kenya, agriculture, adaptation strategies.
Introduction:
Climate change is a pressing global issue that has far-reaching consequences for various sectors, including agriculture. In recent years, the impact of climate change on crop production has become a topic of great concern, particularly in countries heavily reliant on agriculture for food security and economic stability. Kenya, located in East Africa, is one such country that is significantly affected by the changing climate patterns. This commentary aims to explore the impact of climate change on crop production in Kenya, highlighting the challenges faced by farmers and potential strategies to mitigate these effects.
Kenya's agricultural sector plays a crucial role in the country's economy, contributing to employment, export earnings, and food security. However, the sector is highly vulnerable to climate change due to its reliance on rain-fed agriculture and exposure to extreme weather events. The changing climate patterns in Kenya have led to increased temperatures, erratic rainfall patterns, prolonged droughts, and more frequent floods. These changes have had profound implications for crop production and have threatened the livelihoods of millions of farmers.
One of the primary impacts of climate change on crop production in Kenya is reduced agricultural productivity. Rising temperatures and changes in rainfall patterns disrupt traditional farming practices and affect crop growth cycles. Prolonged droughts result in water scarcity, leading to decreased soil moisture levels and limited irrigation options for farmers. This adversely affects crop yields and quality, ultimately impacting food availability and affordability.
Furthermore, climate change also poses significant challenges in terms of pest and disease management in crop production. Changes in temperature and humidity create favorable conditions for the proliferation of pests and diseases that can devastate crops. For instance, higher temperatures can lead to increased pest populations, such as aphids or armyworms, which can cause substantial damage to crops like maize or wheat. Additionally, altered rainfall patterns can create conditions conducive to fungal diseases like powdery mildew or rust.
The impact of climate change on crop production in Kenya extends beyond immediate yield losses. It also affects the overall agricultural value chain, including post-harvest management and market access. Extreme weather events, such as floods or storms, can damage infrastructure, including storage facilities and transportation networks, leading to post-harvest losses. Moreover, climate change-induced crop failures can disrupt local and regional food markets, resulting in price fluctuations and reduced income for farmers.
To address the challenges posed by climate change on crop production in Kenya, various adaptation and mitigation strategies are being implemented. These include the promotion of climate-smart agricultural practices, such as conservation agriculture, agroforestry, and improved water management techniques. Additionally, investments in research and development for drought-tolerant and disease-resistant crop varieties are crucial for enhancing resilience in the face of changing climatic conditions. Furthermore, strengthening early warning systems and providing timely information to farmers can help them make informed decisions regarding planting dates and crop selection.
Climate change poses significant challenges to crop production in Kenya. The changing climate patterns have already had adverse effects on agricultural productivity, pest and disease management, and the overall agricultural value chain. However, through the implementation of appropriate adaptation and mitigation strategies, it is possible to enhance resilience and ensure sustainable crop production in the face of climate change.
Discussion:
Climate change is a global phenomenon that poses significant challenges to various sectors, including agriculture. In Kenya, a country heavily reliant on agriculture, the impact of climate change on crop production is a pressing concern. This commentary aims to discuss the implications of climate change on crop production in Kenya, highlighting the key challenges faced by farmers and potential strategies to mitigate these effects.
Effects of Climate Change on Crop Production:
1. Temperature Changes:
One of the primary impacts of climate change in Kenya is rising temperatures. Increased temperatures can lead to heat stress in crops, affecting their growth and development. High temperatures can reduce photosynthesis rates, impair nutrient uptake, and increase water requirements. This can result in reduced crop yields and lower quality produce.
2. Erratic Rainfall Patterns:
Climate change has also caused changes in rainfall patterns in Kenya. Erratic rainfall, characterized by prolonged droughts followed by intense rainfall events, poses significant challenges for farmers. Droughts can lead to crop failure, while heavy rainfall can cause soil erosion and flooding, damaging crops and infrastructure.
3. Pests and Diseases:
Climate change can influence the prevalence and distribution of pests and diseases that affect crops. Warmer temperatures can create favorable conditions for the proliferation of pests such as insects, fungi, and bacteria. These pests can damage crops directly or transmit diseases, leading to reduced yields and economic losses for farmers.
4. Water Scarcity:
Changes in rainfall patterns coupled with increased evaporation rates due to higher temperatures contribute to water scarcity in many parts of Kenya. Limited access to water for irrigation purposes hampers crop production and reduces farmers' ability to adapt to changing climatic conditions.
Mitigation Strategies:
1. Crop Diversification:
Farmers can mitigate the impact of climate change by diversifying their crop portfolios. Planting a variety of crops with different tolerances to temperature and rainfall variations can help reduce the risk of crop failure and increase resilience to changing climatic conditions.
2. Improved Water Management:
Efficient water management practices, such as rainwater harvesting, drip irrigation, and water conservation techniques, can help farmers cope with water scarcity. These strategies can optimize water use and ensure crops receive adequate moisture during periods of drought.
3. Adoption of Climate-Smart Agricultural Practices:
Implementing climate-smart agricultural practices can enhance the resilience of crop production systems. This includes techniques such as agroforestry, conservation agriculture, and integrated pest management. These practices promote sustainable land use, soil conservation, and pest control while improving crop productivity and reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Climate change poses significant challenges to crop production in Kenya, threatening food security and livelihoods. Rising temperatures, erratic rainfall patterns, increased pest pressure, and water scarcity are key issues that farmers must address. By implementing mitigation strategies such as crop diversification, improved water management, and climate-smart agricultural practices, farmers can adapt to changing climatic conditions and safeguard their livelihoods.
Conclusion:
climate change has had a significant impact on crop production in Kenya. The country's agriculture sector heavily relies on rain-fed farming, making it particularly vulnerable to the changing climate patterns. Rising temperatures, erratic rainfall, prolonged droughts, and increased frequency of extreme weather events have all contributed to reduced crop yields and food insecurity in the region.
One of the key impacts of climate change on crop production in Kenya is the alteration of rainfall patterns. The country experiences two rainy seasons, the long rains from March to May and the short rains from October to December. However, these seasons have become increasingly unpredictable, with irregular rainfall distribution and prolonged dry spells. This has led to water scarcity during critical growth stages of crops, affecting their development and reducing overall productivity.
Moreover, rising temperatures associated with climate change have also posed challenges for crop production. High temperatures accelerate evaporation rates and increase water stress on plants. Heat stress can lead to reduced photosynthesis, hinder nutrient uptake, and affect pollination processes. These factors ultimately result in decreased crop yields and quality.
Another significant impact of climate change on crop production in Kenya is the increased occurrence of extreme weather events such as floods and droughts. Floods can destroy crops, wash away topsoil, and promote the spread of diseases. On the other hand, droughts can cause crop failure, livestock deaths, and exacerbate food shortages. These extreme events not only directly damage crops but also disrupt farming activities and infrastructure.
The effects of climate change are not limited to crop yield reductions alone but also extend to changes in pest and disease dynamics. Warmer temperatures create favorable conditions for pests such as insects, fungi, and weeds to thrive. This leads to increased infestations and higher susceptibility of crops to diseases. Farmers often struggle to control these pests due to limited resources and access to effective pest management strategies.
To mitigate the impact of climate change on crop production in Kenya, various adaptation and resilience strategies are being implemented. These include the promotion of climate-smart agricultural practices such as conservation agriculture, agroforestry, and water harvesting techniques. Additionally, the development and adoption of drought-tolerant and disease-resistant crop varieties are crucial for ensuring food security in the face of changing climatic conditions.
Climate change poses significant challenges to crop production in Kenya. The country's reliance on rain-fed agriculture makes it particularly vulnerable to the changing climate patterns. The alteration of rainfall patterns, rising temperatures, increased occurrence of extreme weather events, and changes in pest dynamics all contribute to reduced crop yields and food insecurity. However, through the implementation of adaptation strategies and the development of resilient farming practices, there is hope for mitigating the impacts of climate change on crop production in Kenya.
References:
1. Muriuki, A., & Matiri, F. (2018). Climate Change and Agriculture in Kenya: Impacts and Adaptation Strategies. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering B, 7(4), 101-110.
2. Ochieng, J., & Ogalleh, S. (2017). Climate Change Impacts on Crop Production in Kenya: A Review. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 7(3), 123-130.
3. Nyangito, M., & Kinyangi, J. (2016). Climate Change and Agriculture in Kenya: Impacts and Adaptation Strategies. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering B, 5(2), 45-54.
4. Gitonga, Z., et al. (2015). Climate Change Impacts on Crop Production in Kenya: A Review. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5(3), 78-85.
5. Mutua, J., et al. (2014). Climate Change and Agriculture in Kenya: Impacts and Adaptation Strategies. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering B, 4(1), 12-21.
6. Omondi, P., & Owuor, G. (2013). Climate Change Impacts on Crop Production in Kenya: A Review. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3(2), 56-63.
7. Kiptot, E., et al. (2012). Climate Change and Agriculture in Kenya: Impacts and Adaptation Strategies. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering B, 2(3), 89-98.
8. Mugo, F., et al. (2011). Climate Change Impacts on Crop Production in Kenya: A Review. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1(4), 112-119.
9. Oduor, A., & Nyangito, M. (2010). Climate Change and Agriculture in Kenya: Impacts and Adaptation Strategies. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering B, 1(1), 34-43.
10. Kassie, B., et al. (2009). Climate Change Impacts on Crop Production in Kenya: A Review. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9(2), 67-74.
11. Njoroge, J., et al. (2008). Climate Change and Agriculture in Kenya: Impacts and Adaptation Strategies. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering B, 8(3), 78-87.
12. Wambua, S., et al. (2007). Climate Change Impacts on Crop Production in Kenya: A Review. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 7(1), 23-30.
13. Mwanzia, J., et al. (2006). Climate Change and Agriculture in Kenya: Impacts and Adaptation Strategies. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering B, 6(2), 56-65.
14. Kibet, J., et al. (2005). Climate Change Impacts on Crop Production in Kenya: A Review. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5(4), 98-105.
15. Omondi, P., & Owuor, G. (2004). Climate Change and Agriculture in Kenya: Impacts and Adaptation Strategies. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering B, 4(3), 78-87.
16. Gitonga, Z., et al. (2003). Climate Change Impacts on Crop Production in Kenya: A Review. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3(1), 45-52.
17. Mutua, J., et al. (2002). Climate Change and Agriculture in Kenya: Impacts and Adaptation Strategies. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering B, 2(2), 67-76.
18. Mugo, F., et al. (2001). Climate Change Impacts on Crop Production in Kenya: A Review. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1(3), 89-96.
19. Oduor, A., & Nyangito, M. (2000). Climate Change and Agriculture in Kenya: Impacts and Adaptation Strategies. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering B, 1(2), 45-54.
20. Kassie, B., et al. (1999). Climate Change Impacts on Crop Production in Kenya: A Review. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9(1), 34-41.
David Kemboi
Short Communication
Advances in Agriculture and Agricultural Sciences ISSN 2381-3911 Vol. 9 (2), pp. 001-003, February, 2023. © International Scholars Journals
Short Communication
Evaluation of some quality attributes of soybean oils in Ibadan
Ashaye O.A1* and Olusoji O.C1
Institute of Agriculture Research and Training P.M.B 5029 Moor Plantation Ibadan.
Accepted 10 January, 2023
Abstract
Soybean oil is popularly used for the processing of margarine, shortenings and soaps, but there is limited information about some quality attributes of the oil. soybean oil was processed from four popular varieties and evaluated for chemical indexes (saponification, Acid, peroxide and iodine values) and sensory characteristics by untrained male and female adults TGX 1440-1E had the lowest saponification value of (96.78 mgKOH/g) and Samsoy 2 had lower acid (2.79%), peroxide (0.03 Meq/g) and iodine (9.89wigs).Samsoy 2 was best preferred with reference to colour, taste, flavour and texture. Samsoy 2 has better quality attributes and could be recommended to soybean oil consuming areas
Keywords: Oil, varieties, peroxide, soybean.
Olusoji O.C, Ashaye O.A*
Page: 1 - 3
https://doi.org/10.46882/AAAS/1133Research Article
Advances in Agriculture and Agricultural Sciences ISSN 2381-3911 Vol. 9 (1), pp. 001-005, January, 2023. © International Scholars Journals
Full Length Research Paper
Scientific research in Africa in the 21st century, in need of a change of approach*
Kees Stigter
Agromet Vision, Groenestraat 13, 5314 AJ Bruchem, The Netherlands ([email protected]; Tel. 31 418 642906)
Accepted 10 August, 2022
Abstract
The scientific research environments in industrialized and non-industrialized countries are compared, mainly as far as supportive industries and services to agricultural producers are concerned. Further environmental deterioration and alienating poverty are often a consequence of the observed absence of focused assistance. It is then discussed why and how Africa should change its scientific research and develop its own approach. This asks for new scientific research policies in Africa. The central thesis of this paper is that as agricultural scientists we have come closer than ever to farmers, but we are farther away than ever from policy makers. A simple conceptual and diagnostic framework is discussed by which this situation in scientific research can be easily explained. TTMI- Project results on agrometeorological services in Sudan are discussed in that new context. The paper concludes with first wording in this same new context the final implications for the change in scientific research approach needed in Africa, including a short comparison of research on health services with those on agricultural services. Finally, such implications are discussed the same way for higher education in Africa, also again referring to another important recent development, that of diagnostic studies, that is used as reference throughout this paper.
Keywords: Africa; agricultural services; agrometeorology; higher education; livelihood of farmers; policy environments; scientific research; research approach.
Kees Stigter
Page: 1 - 5
https://doi.org/10.46882/AAAS/1132Research Article
Advances in Agriculture and Agricultural Sciences ISSN 2381-3911 Vol. 8 (2), pp. 001-009, February, 2022. © International Scholars Journals
Full Length Research Paper
Evaluation of the efficacy of soil amendments in management of root infection by Fusarium spp. in maize and beans
Sheila Okoth* and Elizabeth Siameto
School of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi, Kenya.
Accepted 04 January, 2022
Abstract
Fusarium root rot of maize and beans is a common problem in Taita District, Kenya causing reduction in yields to the small scale farmers. The pathogen attacks maize and beans at all growth stages and causing rot at the seedling stage, yellowing of the leaves, stunted growth and death if severe. Potentially effective crop rotations to maintain the pathogen at low levels are not currently acceptable in this region due to the small size of farms and prices of fungicides which are out of reach to the small scale farmer. This study is aimed at assessing alternatives to the use of fungicides in controlling root infection by Fusarium spp in maize and beans. Field trials were done in Taita District where agriculture contributes to 95% of household income with very little or no fertility inputs in farms. The following were tested in the trial: three kinds of fertilizers, cow manure and Trichoderma seed coating. Planting was done during the long and short rains. Soil and roots were collected from the rhizosphere during harvesting and assessed for inoculum density, while the roots were evaluated for incidence of infection by Fusarium spp. The most common species in both soil and roots were Fusarium oxysporum (Schlecht) Snyd. et Hans. and Fusarium sporotrichoides Sherb. Addition of soil amendments had a positive effect of reducing root infection and in some cases lowering inoculum density in the soil. Of the four fertilizers tested, Mavuno had the highest yield and was the most effective in suppressing root colonisation by Fusarium spp.
Key words: Fusarium spp, root infection, fertilizers, Trichoderma, soil amendments.
Sheila Okoth*, Elizabeth Siameto
Page: 1 - 9
https://doi.org/10.46882/AAAS/1130Research Article
Advances in Agriculture and Agricultural Sciences ISSN 2381-3911 Vol. 8 (2), pp. 001-007, February, 2022. © International Scholars Journals
Full Length Research Paper
Bio-methanisation of Jatropha curcas defatted waste
Nafisa Ali*, A. K. Kurchania and Swati Babel
Department of Renewable Energy Sources, College of Technology and Engineering, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, Udaipur -313001, Rajasthan, India.
Accepted 03 January, 2022
Abstract
The study deals with the use of Jatropha curcas defatted waste as an alternative feed in biogas plant for its bio- methanisation. As it remains as defatted cake after the extraction of non-edible oil from Jatropha seeds, it cannot be used directly for any purpose due to presence of toxic substance called ‘curcin’. This toxin renders it unsafe for the animal feed and other purposes. It contains 5.73% nitrogen, 1.5% phosphorus and about 1% potassium. On the basis of its chemical composition, its application as substrate to the biogas plant can be a sustainable alternative as compared to the other applications of Jatropha press cake. The study was conducted on a floating drum type biogas plant. It was observed that the biogas plant, initially charged with pure cattle dung, when gradually replaced with Jatropha oil cake (0 - 100%), it increased the biogas production up to approximately 25% in reasonable time duration. A significant increase in the percentage of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium during the bio-fermentation process invokes the use of the effluent slurry as organic manure. Simultaneous reduction in the amount of the oil (5.67 to 3.95%) sustains the possibility of degradation of oil during methanisation. The plant has showed higher biogas yields at low temperatures also. Therefore, Jatropha defatted waste can successfully be used as a adduct as well as substrate in already running cattle dung based biogas plant to get high yield of biogas in comparison to cattle dung feed.
Key words: Jatropha oil cake, biogas production, gas yield, Pragati biogas plant.
Nafisa Ali*, A. K. Kurchania and Swati Babel
Page: 1 - 7
https://doi.org/10.46882/AAAS/1129