ISSN 2998-1033
Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies | Vol. 3, No. 2, February 2012 | pp. 117–125
DOI: 10.46882/2012/GJPCS/000037
Research Article
The Dynamics of Social Media Mobilization in the Syrian Uprising: High-Risk Activism and Network Topology
Bassem Al-Shami¹
¹Department of Sociology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
Abstract: The role of micro-blogging networks and decentralized communication structures in authoritarian regimes presents a critical test for modern mobilization theories. This study examines digital coordination dynamics within urban networks across Syria during the early phases of political contestation. Utilizing a dataset of 45,000 geolocated communication logs alongside snowballed activist interviews, we map digital networks to determine factors driving protest persistence under severe state repression. The network models reveal that highly decentralized, multi-hub communication configurations increased tactical survivability margins by 62% compared to centralized informational hierarchies (p < 0.01). Time-series regression indicates that the distribution of state counter-narratives created an operational noise variance of 14% ± 2.8%, delaying physical protest synchronization by an average of 4.2 hours. However, structural equation modeling shows that prolonged digital tracking by state intelligence increased individual vulnerability to targeted arrests by a factor of 1.85. The study concludes that while decentralized digital topologies accelerate structural mobilization under high-risk conditions, they require strict operational anonymity frameworks to preserve activist safety.
Keywords: social media mobilization, Syrian uprising, network topology, high-risk activism, digital coordination, state repression
Manuscript Timeline: Received November 14, 2011; Revised December 28, 2011; Accepted January 18, 2012; Published February 11, 2012.
Citation: Al-Shami, B. (2012). The Dynamics of Social Media Mobilization in the Syrian Uprising: High-Risk Activism and Network Topology. Global Journal of Peace and Conflict Studies, 3(2), 117–125. DOI: 10.46882/2012/GJPCS/000037
Subscribe to read the full article: https://internationalscholarsjournals.org/subscribe-to-read