International Journal of Agricultural Sciences

ISSN 2167-0447

International Journal of Agricultural Sciences ISSN: 2167-0447 Vol. 3 (10), pp. 046-052, December, 2013. © International Scholars Journals

Full Length Research Paper

Soil loss prediction using USLE and MUSLE under conservation tillage integrated with ‘fanya juus’ in Choke Mountain, Ethiopia

Habtamu Muche* 1 Melesse Temesgen 2 and Fantaw Yimer 3

1Debre Markos University, Collage Agriculture and Natural Resource, P.O Box: 269 Debre Markos, Ethiopia.

2Addis Ababa University, Faculty of Technology, P.O.Box 385, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

3Wondo Genet College of Forestry and Natural Resources, P.O.Box: 128, Shashemene, Ethiopia.

*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Accepted 06 November, 2013

Abstract

Conservation tillage is an important strategy for the adoption of soil and water conservation and to reduce runoff and soil loss by water erosion. This study was undertaken to validate USLE/MUSLE as affected by integration of conservation tillage with ‘fanya juus’ at Enerata kebele, East Gojjam of Amhara Region. Runoff and soil loss were collected from 38 storm events through isolated trenches for calibration and validation of the models. Input variables required by USLE and MUSLE models mainly rainfall erosivity, soil erodibility, topography of the land, land use and crop management factors were obtained from field measurements. The results showed that both models underestimated soil loss. On average, the efficiency of MUSLE model was 71.5% while that of USLE was 53.5%. This was due to the runoff which was considered as an input for MUSLE model. Runoff was found to be a better indicator than rainfall for soil loss prediction. Overall, the MUSLE model was good to estimate soil loss and to plan different soil conservation programs.

Key words: Conservation tillage, fanya juus, MUSLE, soil loss, USLE.